The mystery cult of Prajñāpāramitā was Conze's petulant revenge on a world full of people that he judged to be unworthy. He loved to taunt his readers over their incomprehension and "spiritual" inferiority. But he was a fraud.
On the plus side, if he had liked people even a little bit, then he could easily have become another L. Ron Hubbard. Fortunately, despite being intensely charismatic Conze just couldn't stand being around those he referred to as canaille literally "a pack of dogs".
The first step to reinvigorating Prajñāpāramitā studies is to dethrone Conze and drive a stake through his shrivelled heart.
26 September 2019
10 September 2019
Judas
As I understand Christianity it is the death of Christ on the cross that atones for all sins. The resurrection is also important, but the actual crucifixion.
The Romans crucified Jesus and thus did all Christians a big favour, apparently. But the one guy who made it all happen is seen as a "traitor". I'm speaking of Judas who sold Jesus to the Romans for 30 pieces of silver. On the one hand, sure, it's a betrayal and I get that at the time people might have been miffed. But the crucifixion became the centrepiece for the whole religion, the rationale for redemption, and provided Christians with both their most enduring symbol - the cross.
If Judas had not sold Jesus down the river, he might have escaped custody. Judas facilitated the most important moment in the history of Christianity since the nativity.
Billy Graham has said "Jesus’ death on the cross is important because without it we would have no hope of forgiveness or eternal life. "
"The Pope has said “Salvation comes only from the cross, from this cross where God was made flesh. There is no salvation in ideas; there is no salvation in good will, in wanting to be good. No! The only salvation is in Christ crucified because only he — like the bronze serpent — was able to take upon himself the poison of our sin and heal us.”I could multiple examples, but I think this suggests that my understanding of it is approximately right.
The Romans crucified Jesus and thus did all Christians a big favour, apparently. But the one guy who made it all happen is seen as a "traitor". I'm speaking of Judas who sold Jesus to the Romans for 30 pieces of silver. On the one hand, sure, it's a betrayal and I get that at the time people might have been miffed. But the crucifixion became the centrepiece for the whole religion, the rationale for redemption, and provided Christians with both their most enduring symbol - the cross.
If Judas had not sold Jesus down the river, he might have escaped custody. Judas facilitated the most important moment in the history of Christianity since the nativity.
29 July 2019
The UK right wing are working to an agenda
Here is the agenda in outline.
1. Take over the Tory Party
2. Leave the EU
3. Win a majority
4. Implement an undiluted neoliberal agenda of deregulation, tax cuts, (social) spending cuts.
The goal being a massive transfer of wealth from the working people of the UK, into the offshore accounts of the wealthy.
Step 1 is accomplished.
Step 2 is essential since, despite essentially being a neoliberal establishment, the EU protects workers and human rights and is thus not neoliberal enough. This step will be accomplished in 31 Oct.
The fact that leaving the EU with no deal is likely to cause a recession only works in their favour. They will be "forced" to reduce spending in response to a shrinking economy and a deficit blowout.
Step 3 is where we might stop them. At present they can't win an outright majority. But they've now got a populist figurehead who is in full electioneering mode, though he has yet to call an election so no one else is campaigning.
If they get to step 4, they'll gut the UK, sell off the organs to the highest bidder, and pocket the profits.
We need to stop focussing on Boris the clown and see the bigger picture. If anything he is the distraction from the real action. The far right of the Tory Party are now in the driver's seat.
We also need to see the current (uncosted) spending plans as classic election bribes for disaffected swing voters. They need to win an election in order to force through the far-right agenda. This is priority no.1 now.
To date the socialists and social-liberals have no answer to the populist politics of the far right.
If that is not bad enough, most of these far right politicians are either climate change deniers, or they just don't give a fuck and won't act to meet targets. They'll make a profit either way - like Goldman Sachs' big windfall during the global financial crisis.
1. Take over the Tory Party
2. Leave the EU
3. Win a majority
4. Implement an undiluted neoliberal agenda of deregulation, tax cuts, (social) spending cuts.
The goal being a massive transfer of wealth from the working people of the UK, into the offshore accounts of the wealthy.
Step 1 is accomplished.
Step 2 is essential since, despite essentially being a neoliberal establishment, the EU protects workers and human rights and is thus not neoliberal enough. This step will be accomplished in 31 Oct.
The fact that leaving the EU with no deal is likely to cause a recession only works in their favour. They will be "forced" to reduce spending in response to a shrinking economy and a deficit blowout.
Step 3 is where we might stop them. At present they can't win an outright majority. But they've now got a populist figurehead who is in full electioneering mode, though he has yet to call an election so no one else is campaigning.
If they get to step 4, they'll gut the UK, sell off the organs to the highest bidder, and pocket the profits.
We need to stop focussing on Boris the clown and see the bigger picture. If anything he is the distraction from the real action. The far right of the Tory Party are now in the driver's seat.
We also need to see the current (uncosted) spending plans as classic election bribes for disaffected swing voters. They need to win an election in order to force through the far-right agenda. This is priority no.1 now.
To date the socialists and social-liberals have no answer to the populist politics of the far right.
If that is not bad enough, most of these far right politicians are either climate change deniers, or they just don't give a fuck and won't act to meet targets. They'll make a profit either way - like Goldman Sachs' big windfall during the global financial crisis.
12 June 2019
New Dinky Door
The seventh dinky door has been installed in Cambridge (and I have deciphered the clues to find it). Here is my map showing all the locations to date.
Finding them all in one day would be a quite a good way to see our city.
Finding them all in one day would be a quite a good way to see our city.
26 April 2019
Surveillance
A young American woman, MacKenzie Fegan, is about to board her plane for an international flight with JetBlue. Instead of looking at her boarding pass, the attendant asks her to look at a camera for facial recognition.
As she takes her seat, she starts to wonder, how did it know what I looked like? And she wonders, "Did I consent to this?".
She tweets these thoughts. The airline responds. You can opt out it says. Obviously this was not made clear at the time because our girl wasn't offered the choice. The airline continues by saying that it gets the information from Homeland Security.
"Wait", she thinks, "Homeland Security know what I look like? Why does Homeland Security know what I look like."
Homeland Security is, of course, the government department set up in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It is tasked with countering terrorism, border security, immigration control, cybersecurity, and disaster planning and management.
So she is wondering how knowing what her face looks like is going to help Homeland Security fight terrorism. Because she is a law abiding, food writer. The only way that Homeland Security would have her image would be if they have an image of everyone.
Edward Snowden blew the whistle on the USA security services arbitrary collection of data on all citizens regardless of whether they were suspected of crimes. That was illegal at the time. Homeland Security, the NSA, and the CIA were implicated
A peripheral question is, how many security organisations does the US need? How much is the USA spending on security these days?
MacKenzie also wonders how come a private company has access to her Homeland Security file. Well, the airline go right ahead and assure her that they don't have direct access to Homeland Security, rather Homeland Security make it available to the Customs and Border Protection database. And the airline checks that.
When she asks for more information, MacKenzie is directed to a press release from JetBlue which brags a lot how efficient this new surveillance technique but does not give any information about the process or the consent issue. There is no information on how to opt out or whether the fact that one opts out is recorded.
This happened last week. We don't know how the story ends.
Given the trade in our metadata that already exists, it's not a stretch of the imagination to think that companies will be collecting and trading in our biometric metadata soon too. The internet already knows what you buy online and what you search for online. And your phone company already tracks your movements. Govts already routinely monitor all phone calls, texts, and emails. How long till all this is combined?
This unfinished story raises many questions.
Are we ready for a world in which everything we do and say is tracked and becomes a commodity from which we do not benefit? What happens when there are mistakes?
How much more liberty do we give up, how much surveillance is enough to keep us safe from terrorism? And who keeps us safe from the state, the chief executive of which is presently an unstable authoritarian extremist?
As she takes her seat, she starts to wonder, how did it know what I looked like? And she wonders, "Did I consent to this?".
She tweets these thoughts. The airline responds. You can opt out it says. Obviously this was not made clear at the time because our girl wasn't offered the choice. The airline continues by saying that it gets the information from Homeland Security.
"Wait", she thinks, "Homeland Security know what I look like? Why does Homeland Security know what I look like."
Homeland Security is, of course, the government department set up in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It is tasked with countering terrorism, border security, immigration control, cybersecurity, and disaster planning and management.
So she is wondering how knowing what her face looks like is going to help Homeland Security fight terrorism. Because she is a law abiding, food writer. The only way that Homeland Security would have her image would be if they have an image of everyone.
Edward Snowden blew the whistle on the USA security services arbitrary collection of data on all citizens regardless of whether they were suspected of crimes. That was illegal at the time. Homeland Security, the NSA, and the CIA were implicated
A peripheral question is, how many security organisations does the US need? How much is the USA spending on security these days?
MacKenzie also wonders how come a private company has access to her Homeland Security file. Well, the airline go right ahead and assure her that they don't have direct access to Homeland Security, rather Homeland Security make it available to the Customs and Border Protection database. And the airline checks that.
When she asks for more information, MacKenzie is directed to a press release from JetBlue which brags a lot how efficient this new surveillance technique but does not give any information about the process or the consent issue. There is no information on how to opt out or whether the fact that one opts out is recorded.
This happened last week. We don't know how the story ends.
Given the trade in our metadata that already exists, it's not a stretch of the imagination to think that companies will be collecting and trading in our biometric metadata soon too. The internet already knows what you buy online and what you search for online. And your phone company already tracks your movements. Govts already routinely monitor all phone calls, texts, and emails. How long till all this is combined?
This unfinished story raises many questions.
Are we ready for a world in which everything we do and say is tracked and becomes a commodity from which we do not benefit? What happens when there are mistakes?
How much more liberty do we give up, how much surveillance is enough to keep us safe from terrorism? And who keeps us safe from the state, the chief executive of which is presently an unstable authoritarian extremist?
11 April 2019
Deep Adaptation
Bendell, Jem. Deep Adaptation: A Map for Navigating Climate Tragedy. (IFLAS Occasional Paper 2) July 27th 2018. http://www.lifeworth.com/deepadaptation.pdf
I guess this paper should come with a trigger warning. This is the most pessimistic end of the climate change spectrum. Vice Magazine billed it as: "The Climate Change Paper So Depressing It's Sending People to Therapy."
Abstract
The purpose of this conceptual paper is to provide readers with an opportunity to reassess their work and life in the face of an inevitable nearterm social collapse due to climate change.
The approach of the paper is to analyse recent studies on climate change and its implications for our ecosystems, economies and societies, as provided by academic journals and publications direct from research institutes.
That synthesis leads to a conclusion there will be a near-term collapse in society with serious ramifications for the lives of readers. The paper reviews some of the reasons why collapse-denial may exist, in particular, in the professions of sustainability research and practice, therefore leading to these arguments having been absent from these fields until now.
The paper offers a new meta-framing of the implications for research, organisational practice, personal development and public policy, called the Deep Adaptation Agenda. Its key aspects of resilience, relinquishment and restorations are explained. This agenda does not seek to build on existing scholarship on “climate adaptation” as it is premised on the view that social collapse is now inevitable.
The author believes this is one of the first papers in the sustainability management field to conclude that climate-induced societal collapse is now inevitable in the near term and therefore to invite scholars to explore the implications.
08 April 2019
Fascism in Australia
He's right. These days it is un-Australian to tell the truth, have values, or do the right thing; at least as far as the national and state parliaments are concerned.
Four police armed with guns and batons to arrest one girl. And the PM using jingoistic justifications like protesting is "un-Australian".
However, once the state starts using violence against peaceful protesters they have lost the moral argument. Rule by violence and the threat of violence is a symptom of Fascism.
The UK has a similar problem with dishonest and corrupt politicians. The rebellion starts on the 15th of this month.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)